The Grand Budapest Hotel film analysis
Summary of the film
We travel back in time to 1932, when The Grand Budapest Hotel was thriving. Gustave, the hotel's meticulous and highly competent concierge, has a habit of sleeping with the hotel's wealthy older guests and is currently involved in an affair with Madame D., a wealthy dowager countess in her 80s.
Gustave gets to know of Madame D.'s death fairly soon after her visit. He and the new lobby boy, Zero, a younger version of Mr. Moustafa, pay their respects at Madame D's house. They find her children, extended family, and lawyer, Mr. Kovacs, waiting to hear the countess' will read. Only one detail is revealed by Kovacs: Madame has left Gustave a priceless painting, Boy With Apple. Dmitri, Madame D.'s son, demands that Gustave be arrested. Gustave and Zero flee quickly, but not before stealing the painting from the wall and hiding it at the hotel for safekeeping.
Gustave is arrested for the murder of Madame D once he returns to the Grand Budapest. He makes friends with other inmates and plans an escape while in prison. He has Zero hide digging tools inside pastries baked by Zero's girlfriend, Agatha. Gustave and the other men are able to escape and part ways. Zero and Gustave return to the Grand Budapest with the assistance of the Society of the Crossed Keys, a group of concierges who call in favors to help each other.
When Gustave, Zero, and Agatha return to the Grand Budapest, they discover that it has been taken over by the country's army; war has broken out. Agatha slips in to get Boy With Apple so they can sell it and flee. Dmitri enters the hotel and spots her with the painting just as she walks out with it. Gustave and Zero go inside to save her as she attempts to flee Dmitri. Dmitri opens fire on them, resulting in a gun battle involving all of the soldiers staying at the hotel. Agatha's escape attempt results in her and Zero hanging from the balcony of one of the rooms before falling into a car full of pastries, which breaks their fall.
When Gustave, Zero, and Agatha return to the Grand Budapest, they discover that it has been taken over by the country's army; war has broken out. Agatha slips in to get Boy With Apple so they can sell it and flee. Dmitri enters the hotel and spots her with the painting just as she walks out with it. Gustave and Zero go inside to save her as she attempts to flee Dmitri. Dmitri opens fire on them, resulting in a gun battle involving all of the soldiers staying at the hotel. Agatha's flee effort results in her and Zero suspended from the balcony of one of the rooms prior to actually falling into a car full of pastries, which breaks their fall.
Agatha discovers a note hidden on the back of the painting stating that if Madame D. was murdered, she is leaving everything to Gustave. Gustave becomes one of the country's wealthiest men and the owner of The Grand Budapest Hotel. He, Zero, and Agatha are traveling by train when they are stopped by army death troops, who tear up Zero's identification papers (he is a refugee). Gustave starts fighting the men and is shot dead.
Zero is Gustave's sole heir to his fortune, which is how he inherited his great wealth, but also why he traded all of his commodities for The Grand Budapest, which is now a struggling property because it holds all of his memories of Gustave and his relationship with Agatha.
The Author then turns this story into a book, which the young girl from the film's beginning adores. As the film concludes, we see her sitting on a bench next to the Author's statue.
Themes of the film
Secular Society and Privilege
Inherited wealth and trust funds
Corruption and Finances
How the film utilizes technical media elements to paint a narrative (especially mise-en-scene)
The use of color and aspect ratio
Costume design
Production Design
- His set design is undeniably unique, and primarily does this through costumes and set design which act as representations of either the character or the story.
- Anderson’s team creates worlds that place the viewer inside a storybook, as we see in the example of the Grand Budapest Hotel certain time frames have different aspect ratios, have different colour palettes such as the difference in saturation that play into the storybook imagination aspect of his unique craft.
- The setting almost acts as characters, as the setting moves with the character, placing an emphasis on the theme of such particular movie. In the Grand Budapest we can see that the set design is robust, implies rich history and helps to build mood and tone. Anderson knows that the Grand Budapest almost acts like a boat that sets the story in motion for Gustav and Zero as to why he makes the place so grandeur, It makes Gustav look like he is sucking up or even sees himself as part of the elite and shows how different Zero is as to being an outcast with his cheap-ish uniform in comparison to Gustav and how his room in the hotel looks so vastly different to Gustav’s and the other guest bedrooms.
- Adam Stockhausen (american production designer who worked with people such as Steven Spielberg, Steve Mcqueen and Anna Pinnock) notes that the German artistic style Jugendstil (popular from the mid-1890s to the early 20th century) was the primary influence for the hotel's decor. He is the driving force in Anderson’s film as his ecletic production design is still famously known today. For “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” Stockhausen wholeheartedly embraced the handmade, analog world of Eastern European opulence. The town became a pastel delight, and The Grand Budapest was modeled after many hotels from the region, cobbled together with a patchwork of eye-popping designs, colors, fabrics, and decor.
- We see the hotel in its '30s heyday, then watch it wilt during the Soviet era of the '60s before becoming the inspiration for a beloved book in the present day. This meant that a lot of the film's storytelling had to be born out in the sets, some of which were built within each other in order to portray different time periods using roughly the same physical space. Production designer Adam Stockhausen, a frequent collaborator of Anderson's who also worked on The French Dispatch, compares the filmmaking of The Grand Budapest Hotel to solving a puzzle.
- The filmmaker's innovative approach to problem-solving extended beyond the titular hotel itself. The characters travel around Europe a bit, so several scenes are set on a train — and there is a marked difference between riding the train before war breaks out and later in the film when it's staffed by black-clad fascists. A similarly inside-out approach was taken on the film's climactic ski chase, when Zero (Tony Revolori) and Monsieur Gustave (Ralph Fiennes) are on the run from the deadly assassin Jopling (Willem Dafoe). This kind of action set piece seemed a little out of the ordinary for an Anderson movie, but the creative solution was very much in keeping.
Camera and Cinematography
- Anderson is best known for his use of symmetry and is a constant throughout his works. A large part of his works and what makes a shot a Wes Anderson shot however is how he frames for mise en scene where every element of the scene is carefully considered and functions to depict space, time period, theme, plot and character. As a result he uses composition, blocking and camera movements to create a complex ballet.
- Take this scene for example, it begins with a wide shot to take in the opulent dining hall, it’s nearly empty reminding us once again of the once great hotel’s current status. The menu for which is visible for a second contains an easter egg on the front.
- Here the diners are in a symmetrical two shot. Eye to eye and on equal ground
- The last aspect to touch on is the change in aspect ratio throughout the Grand Budapest hotel. In the 1980s intro its 1:85, in the 1960s in anamorphic in 2:4 and in the 1930s in 1.37:1. Anderson uses the aspect ratio to tell the mood and time period of the story.
- His cinematography is precise, casual and punctuated
- This is to provide context to the viewer. Wes Anderson conventionally uses long shots with minimal cuts however when cutting, he occasionally hides the cut to keep the same pace but able to cut and change to a different location. This is shown when the camera crab dollies to the right and passes a pillar in the foreground which means a cut could be made and the audience can’t notice.
Editing and Post production
- Wes Anderson ussually avoids aggresive editing, often staging his scenes in two-shots, and long takes with theatrical blocking. At times he would move through scenes with a quick pace when suddenly static and can help with comedy, generating an unusual effect on top of that, a sort of emotional inertia
- Anderson also tends to share a single thought or conversation across multiple scenes, he uses a single idea throughout multiple cuts.
- Builds emotional inertia with his edit and connects scenes like a jigsaw puzzle
- Wes focusses more so on the camera movement and the shots taken, the only editing that is really noticeable are the rough cuts and even so it is a very stylistic choice. As a lot of his movies incorporate that of pov shots.
- Wes Anderson conventionally uses long shots with minimal cuts however when cutting, he occasionally hides the cut to keep the same pace but able to cut and change to a different location. This is shown when the camera crab dollies to the right and passes a pillar in the foreground which means a cut could be made and the audience can’t notice. Parallel editing is used during this scene as we understand that what Agatha and Dimitri are doing is happening at the same time as what M. Gustave and Zero. Another Wes Anderson convention is using a two shot rather than the classic shot reverse shot continuity editing technique that most directors use. This is to give the audience context and also provides more symmetry.
- For example:
Sound design
- In the film, The Grand Budapest Hotel (Wes Anderson, 2014) uses a mix of diegetic and non-diegetic sound to fit the sequence of the film. The sequence starts with a kettle drum beat that remains present throughout the sequence.
- In the film, The Grand Budapest Hotel (Wes Anderson, 2014) uses a mix of diegetic and non-diegetic sound to fit the sequence of the film. The sequence starts with a kettle drum beat that remains present throughout the sequence. However, this is altered to the actions of the scene and will occasionally pause; this makes it dominant and subdued. This beat also creates a sense of movement and pace.
- The director also uses diegetic sound effects to create the atmosphere of the film, even if some of these effects were added in post production. These effects include the diegetic sounds of paper rustling, wind and the fuel pump. The sounds of wind are used to show the distance from the characters in the scene. Narration is also used as non-diegetic sound that is used to add context and additional information for the audience.
- The music continues to layer throughout the sequence as the simple drum beat advances to a complex beat with a bass line, however the layered sound stops to focus on another diegetic wind sound isolates the score from the rest of the sequence. As the action continues the layered score increases in volume and starts to build up to the church scene. When Zero and Gustave enter the church, the score develops and changes to incorporate the chanting sung by the monks to match the scene. The diegetic dialogue in the confessions booth sounds deliberately like it was done in a box to match the scene in the film.
- It’s a fast pace at the beginning and utilises similar techniques to montage editing. This fast pace could foreshadow the upcoming tense chase scene. Almost all of the cuts synch with the non diegetic composed score as do the actions of the characters such as Agatha’s opening and closing of the curtains. Not only is this satisfying to the viewer but also means the soundtrack provides and maintains pace.
Comments
Post a Comment